Early identification of malignancy in trismus: ten-year evolution of a trismus checklist to improve patient safety.

Introduction Trismus has been identified as a red flag sign that may lead to an early identification of a malignant lesion. A simple checklist was devised to allow clinicians to identify patients who may be at risk.Methods The implementation of this checklist at the temporomandibular disorder clinic of the University Dental Hospital of Manchester has been audited through ten annual cycles, each examining a sample of 50 clinical records of patients referred to the clinic. The standards set were that the presence of the trismus checklist in new patient examination notes should be 100%, the recording of mouth opening should be 100% and that the trismus checklist should be correctly filled in 100% of the time.Results The incidence of trismus ranged from 0-20%. The presence of the trismus checklist in new patient examination notes ranged from 78-100% compliance. The recording of mouth opening ranged from 80-100% compliance. The trismus checklist was not always filled in correctly: it ranged from 50-100%.Conclusion The use of audit has led to the evolution of the checklist and to improvements in its implementation. The trismus checklist has aided the early identification of malignancy. Future work should look at its implementation in a wider range of settings.

A quality improvement project to assess the use of visual aids to improve understanding and motivation in periodontal patients.

AIMS: A quality improvement project was carried out in a General Dental Practice in London. The aim was to improve understanding and motivation in periodontal patients. METHODS: Research into interventions in the medical field to improve understanding and motivation amongst patients, lead to the idea of using visual aids to help motivate periodontal patients and to improve their understanding of the disease. The results from the first Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle using visual aids are presented. RESULTS: After the use of visual aids, patients felt more motivated in maintaining good oral hygiene, felt the visual aids improved their understanding of gum disease and how to take care of their gums and teeth. One hundred percent of patients preferred their diagnosis to be explained to them with visual aids. DISCUSSION: The project supported the increase in motivation and understanding in periodontal patients. However further data is required to learn more about how visual aids influence patient behaviour, how effective they are in improving patients' understanding and motivation, and other factors which play a role in this. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this quality improvement project are promising; it has highlighted that visual aids can have a place in the management of periodontitis in general practice.